| One of
the things I often do when I'm preparing my sermon,
is to go back 3 or 6 years to see what I wrote the
last times these readings were used. It's interesting
to see how the cultural context of the world impacts
the interpretation of the readings.
The last time I preached on this Gospel was exactly
6 years ago on October 1, 2000. How completely
different our world was then. It was pre 9/11.
Pre Charley, Katrina, Wilma. The Red Sox still
hadn't won a World Series. Gene Robinson hadn't
been elected bishop of New Hampshire. We didn't
know what the Taliban was. We were not in a shooting
war with anyone.
Yet, so much has stayed the same. Some of this
may sound familiar. I do have a finite number
of personal sermon illustrations. Some will be
new. But I have come to believe that the message
is even more important today that even just 6
years ago.
Back in the early '60's, when I was really quite
young, we lived in the city of Highland park,
Michigan. A fairly small town surrounded on 4
sides by Detroit. It's where Henry Ford had his
first assembly line and was home to Chrysler's
world headquarters. Dad was on the school board.
In fact, he was president for several years. That
was my first encounter with the political system.
I remember sitting around the table listening
to the local radio station as the election results
would come in either for Dad's re-election, or
for a millage issue. Even at 5 I knew what a millage
was. I remember it as just something we did one
night a year. Campaigning didn't seem to be an
important, or even visible part of my Dad's political
career. It was all rather benign.
Until one day, I was about 7, that would make
it '63 or '64. The teacher's of Highland Park
were attempting to unionize. At the same time,
the civil rights movement was in full swing. I
looked out our front window and saw a group of
people on the sidewalk in front of our house,
carrying signs that said some rather unpleasant
and I thought untrue things about my father.
"Why are those people out there saying those
things about Dad?" I asked. My sister, Martha
had one explanation that I shan't share, but my
Mother said that it was because they disagreed
with Dad about the teachers.
Even then it seemed strange to me that because
they disagreed with my Dad they would find it
necessary to attack him personally. I found out
later that Dad and the superintendent of schools
had been hung in effigy in front of the superintendents
house. I never got that. Of course the biggest
hurt came when we saw that the associate rector
of our church was among those picketing my house.
In his case, my sister's assumption was probably
correct.
Why'd they have to be so mean? Why did they have
to impugn a good man's character because of a
heartfelt disagreement? I think it can be summed
up in the phrase, "If you're not with us,
you must be against us." If you can't support
my position, the only position a rational, well
meaning person could possibly hold, then you must
be against us and there for morally inferior.
I think that's why Joshua was so upset that Eldad
and Medad were prophesying outside the tent..
I think that's why John was so upset that someone
was exorcising demons in Jesus name without the
proper credentials.
We get so hung up with our own situations that
we tend to demonize those that go about life differently.
If you're against unionizing teachers, then you
must not care about teachers. If your for unionizing
teachers you must be a socialist. If you don't
want to make abortion illegal, then you must be
against unborn children. If you don't want to
keep abortion legal then you must be against women's
rights. If you don't think homosexuality is a
God given characteristic then you must be homophobic.
If you believe homosexuality is part of ones God
given character then you must be a heretic. If
you don't believe in ordaining women to the priesthood
you must be anti-woman. If you believe in ordaining
women to the priesthood you must be a radical
feminist. If you're not with us you must be against
us. If you oppose the war you're not supporting
our troops.
As I wrote in this month's Circular, there is
an IRS investigation in process against an Episcopal
Church in Pasadena California. It seems that the
rector preached an anti-war sermon the night before
the presidential election of 2004. Whoever called
the IRS contended that the speech crossed the
line and endorsed a particular candidate. I haven't
seen the text of the sermon, so I don't know.
But I would venture a bet that if the rector's
view on the war was different, this complainant
wouldn't have placed the call. Someone else might
have, but not this person. It's that if you're
not for the war, you're against the government.
Do you remember, right after 9/11, our president
gave a speech in which he said that if a country
was not with us as we prosecuted the war on terrorism,
they were against us. France wouldn't let us fly
over their airspace. Do you remember some places
changing French fries into "freedom fries".
If you're not with us, you must be against us.
In the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion
of which we are a part, this line in the sand
mentality is alive and well. To some of our more
conservative bishops, here and throughout the
world, if you are not ready to leave the Episcopal
Church, then you are a revisionist and must be
avoided. Archbishop Akinola of Nigeria recently
referred to the Episcopal Church as a cancer on
the Anglican Communion which must be removed.
If you don't share our particular understanding
of homosexuality and scriptural interpretation,
you are against us.
Now don't believe for a minute that the conservatives
have a lock on the line drawing. I have heard
it said that if you can't support the consecration
of a gay, partnered bishop, you are a schismatic,
unenlightened cretin.
If your not with us, you must be against us.
But that's not what Jesus said. When he heard
that someone was carrying on ministry in his name
he said, "Anyone who is not against us is
for us." That is a much broader idea of allies
than most of us hold. You don't have to be in
our camp to be a part of the team. You just have
to avoid being against us. Don't be a hindrance.
Don't block our journey. Don't campaign against
us and we will consider you part of the team.
Imagine if that is how we saw each other in the
religious arena. Were would the mean-spirited-ness
find itself? There would only be a tiny fringe
on either side that actively struggled to derail
the other tiny fringe. The rest of us could get
on with doing the world of the church - reconciling
the world to God in Jesus Christ.
Or the political arena? I can only dream of the
day that a politician stood up and said, "my
opponent is every bit as good as I am. This community
would be well served by either of us. I'm better
at this and she's better at that. Make up your
mind." Like I said, it's a dream.
There is plenty of room in this world for people
to disagree and still see the goodness in each
other. There is so much more about me than my
political views, theological views or any other
set of views I might hold. Judge me by my character,
not my views.
I truly believe there is plenty of room in the
church, both at the parish, denominational and
universal levels for people of goodwill to disagree.
That's why I refuse to belong to any issue driven
group.
Whoever is not against us is for us.
I don't want to imply that everybody is always
right. I certainly don't mean that all religious
expression is the same. I truly believe that we
have something to offer in the Anglican tradition
that other traditions cannot offer. And I emphatically
believe that the Christian faith is the faith
ordained by God for our salvation. But I also
believe that it is the sin of arrogance when we
hold out that we have a monopoly on the truth.
God's truth is very large. Much larger than our
ability to discern anywhere near all of it. We
have only scratched the surface of all God is
and will be. We have only scratched the surface
on all humankind is and will be. To assume that
our views are morally superior to anyone else's
is to assume a level of knowledge of God's will
that I find hard to accept.
Whoever is not against us is for us. That throws
the door awfully wide open. We must be very careful
not to place any stumbling block in the way that
might make that door any narrower. Christ is a
door flung wide. Wide enough for even you and
me to enter.
|