| "For
all of them have contributed out of their abundance;
but she out of her poverty has put in everything
she had, all she had to live on." In a bit
of a paradox, I would suggest that the widow was
living an abundant life and the rich people an impoverished
existence.
I was sent to a stewardship seminar when I was
in seminary. One of the sessions was presented
by two young lawyers married to each other. I
just happened to be that the woman was the son
of the diocesan bishop. They were talking about
tithing - giving 10% of household income to the
church. They said that when they were only making
$75,000 tithing was tough, but now that they made
$250,000 it was even harder. Our household income
that year was about $15,000. So, I didn't walk
away with any encouragement to tithe.
This young couple had a lot. I don't know how
badly they were mortgaged or anything like that,
but compared to me, they had abundantly more.
I sensed, though, that they lived an impoverished
life. By this I mean, they focused on how much
they could give without feeling it.
The widow in today's Gospel was terribly poor
by any measure, yet she gave what she had. To
me, this is a life of abundance. She knew what
she had and she knew where it came from. She gave
back to God not out of an abundance of resources,
but out of an abundance of faith.
She knew that God would provide for her. She
knew that God lived in her life. She knew that
no matter how precious that money might be, her
relationship with God was even more precious.
My guess would be that this widow was familiar
with the story of the widow and Elijah. Both her
story and that from 1 Kings are not so much about
wealth and resources as they are about faith.
I need to say a little about Elijah to set the
context of the story of the never ending oil.
We meet Elijah for the first time in the paragraph
before ours. God called Elijah to go into the
wilderness where he was fed by ravens. It was
a time of solitude and reflection to prepare him
for his ministry. From there, God sent him to
the widow in Zaraepath. Following this story,
the widow's son dies and Elijah brings him back
to life.
So, this widow would not have known who Elijah
was. He wasn't a known wandering prophet yet.
He was just some guy telling this beleaguered
widow to feed him. Heck, the birds did, why shouldn't
she? The woman refuses giving the story of her
poverty as an excuse.
Elijah said, "do not be afraid". For
some reason, the woman trusted Elijah. Trusted
him in terms of his being sent by God and trusting
in the promise of God implied in Elijah's request.
She had an abundance of faith and a lack of resources.
But by combining the two, she had an abundance
of both.
We don't know anything about the widow in Mark's
Gospel, other than she was poor and she put in
all of her money. We don't know if her life got
better. We don't know if she ever learned who
that strange teacher sitting across from the treasury
and pointing at her was.
What we do know is that she had enough faith
in God to give over the last of her physical resources
believing in her heart that God would return it
to her abundantly. She was poor in resources,
but rich with faith.
I wonder what Jesus would say about the wealthy
who strive to live a life rich in faith. The scripture
is often filled with hyperbole, exaggeration for
the sake of a point. Mark sort of lumps everyone
into two categories rich and poor. John has Jew
and believer.
I wonder how Jesus would categorize us. Rich,
certainly some of us. Poor? We certainly have
people living with very modest incomes or no income
at all. Society even has a value which defines
poor. I think it's now $16,000. If you make less
than that, you're in poverty. Above it, your not.
I doubt Jesus looks at out tax returns.
There's been a bit of a back and forth in the
letters to the editor in the News-Press. Someone
wrote that on a global basis, there were no truly
poor in this country. Someone wrote back and said
that anyone who made less than $16,000 was, by
definition, poor. I think they're both right,
and their both wrong. A nice Anglican way of resolving
the argument.
I've seen the slums of Detroit and the slums
of Tegucigalpa Honduras and there is no comparison.
We have the social "safety nets" in
place that Hondurans don't. But I don't want to
diminish the hardship of the relatively poor in
this country.
I want to tell you a story of a woman who, while
incredibly poor in resources, lived an abundant
life. Rose Mary was the domestic servant of a
very wealthy family. She didn't make much. She
lived up the hill in a run down, segregates neighborhood.
Her house hadn't been painted in decades. Plywood
scraps covered holes in her floor. She supported
a couple of her adult children and several grandchildren
as a single mom in a tiny, run down house.
We made a habit of taking any food we had left
over after a party or church event to Rosemary.
I remember the first time. We took some ham and
other things. While we were bringing the food
into her house, she told one of the little ones
hanging around to go to several people's homes
and tell them that there was food for them at
Rosemary's.
If Rosemary got enough for 4, you know she fed
at least 8 with it. She made the best chocolate
cake I have ever tasted. The last time we passed
through, she heard that we were coming and baked
a cake for us. Still feeding folk out of her abundance
of faith.
When I worked at the homeless shelter, I frequently
got phone calls, mostly anonymous, asking why
I was helping a bunch of dead-beats. I can't remember
how many times I heard, "I work for my keep,
and no one gives me anything." Now, there
is a point when your generosity stops helping
and starts enabling a welfare mentality. But that's
not what these angry calls were about.
That type of anger comes from a life of poverty.
Certainly no poverty of resources, but of faith,
or perhaps more likely, a poverty of hope. There
are conditions on their generosity, if there is
any generosity at all.
In Charles Dickens' classic, A Christmas Carol,
his Scrooge is the personification of an impoverished
soul. He's not greedy because of a love of money,
rather out of a hatred of life. His character
had become so corrupted with hate and envy that
generosity had no place. He saw the giving as
the loss of something that was his.
After he had the tar scared out of him, he started
living a life of abundance. And that made all
the difference in the world.
A life of abundance sees the potential in people,
things and situations. It sees the hope of a better
tomorrow. The glass is not only half full, it's
getting fuller. Now, I'm not trying to describe
a Pollyannaish attitude. Just because you look
at life with hope doesn't mean you can't see the
real suffering in the world. Truth be told, I
have found that some of the most abundant livers
are living with great pain and suffering. The
difference is that they don't let their suffering
define their character. They see their suffering
as a part of life that really stinks, but it isn't
who they are.
They know who they are. They're children of God.
Children of a loving God. Children of a God that
makes a jug of oil last beyond its expiration
date. A God that sends strangers by with a trunk
full of food.
Both of our biblical widows knew what poverty
was. But they also knew what it meant to live
a life of abundance. A life of abundant faith
in a God of unlimited love.
|